Why does feminist theory suggest that couple's therapy is not appropriate for survivors of intimate partner violence?

Feminist theory posits that couple's therapy is often not suitable for survivors of intimate partner violence because survivors may not be in a position to freely contribute to the therapeutic process. This situation arises from the dynamics of power and control that are typically present in abusive relationships. Victims of intimate partner violence may feel disempowered, fearful, or coerced, which undermines their ability to speak openly and partake equally in therapy sessions.

In the context of couples therapy, where dialogue and mutual understanding are essential, a survivor's inability to assert their feelings or desires can lead to an imbalance that reinforces the existing power dynamics of the relationship. Thus, rather than facilitating healing and communication, couples therapy can inadvertently perpetuate the very dynamics that contributed to the abuse, making it ineffective or even harmful for someone who has survived intimate partner violence.

This view aligns with feminist perspectives that prioritize the safety and autonomy of the individual, emphasizing the importance of individual therapy that can focus on healing and empowerment without the complications that arise in a joint therapy setting with an abuser.