What type of evaluation is most likely to uncover discriminatory practices in school policies regarding truancy?

The correct answer is based on the nature of process evaluations and their ability to investigate the implementation of programs or policies. A process evaluation focuses on how a program is delivered and whether it meets its intended goals. By using secondary data from school records, this type of evaluation allows for a thorough examination of how truancy policies are applied across different demographics, revealing potential discriminatory practices.

In this context, secondary data from school records can include attendance rates, disciplinary actions, and other relevant metrics. Analyzing this data can help identify patterns that may indicate biases or inequalities in how truancy policies are enforced in various student populations. For instance, if data shows disproportionately high disciplinary actions against specific racial or socio-economic groups, it raises questions about the fairness and equity of the policies in place.

Outcome evaluations, while important in assessing the results of a program, do not delve deeply into the operational aspects or the conditions under which the policies are executed. Needs assessments are aimed at understanding the gaps in services or programs but do not typically investigate existing practices. Impact evaluations focus on the broader effects of a policy or program over time, rather than the immediate operational intricacies that might indicate discrimination. Therefore, a process evaluation utilizing secondary data is the most effective approach for uncovering discriminatory